The Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a report in March titled “Many Medicare Claims for Outpatient Physical Therapy Services Did Not Comply with Medicare Requirements.” In the report, OIG found that 61 percent of the Medicare claims it reviewed for outpatient physical therapy did not comply with Medicare requirements for medical necessity, coding or documentation. OIG estimated that during the 6-month audit period, Medicare paid $367 million for these claims. It concluded that these payments were made because the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) did not effectively prevent the improper payments for these services.
OIG made the following recommendations to CMS:
- Instruct the Medicare administrative contractors (MACs) to notify providers of potential overpayments so the providers can follow the requirements under the 60 Day Rule (also known as Reverse False Claims).
- Establish mechanisms to better monitor the appropriateness of outpatient physical therapy claims.
- Review current educational efforts about the requirements for submitting outpatient physical therapy claims for reimbursement.
CMS made comments on the OIG’s draft report. Although CMS agreed with the second and third recommendation, it generally disagreed with the OIG’s findings used to support its first recommendation. Surprisingly, the basis for this disagreement is that CMS disagreed with the OIG’s interpretations of the independent medical review contractors’ policy and felt that further review of those claims was required (as of February 2018, the OIG stated that CMS had not concluded its further review). After reviewing CMS’s comments, the OIG made some amendments to the report but maintained that the error determinations its medical reviewer made were correct.
This report could lead to MACs issuing medical records requests and subsequent overpayment demands focused on outpatient physical therapy services. It also arguably puts outpatient physical therapy providers on notice of credible information about potential overpayments, triggering the provider’s obligations under the 60 Day Rule.
For further information regarding the report or a provider’s obligations under the 60 Day Rule, please contact one of the attorneys below.