View Page As PDF
Share Button
Tweet Button

Earlier this year, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick sparked intense debate when he introduced an economic development bill that included draft legislation proposing to ban most post-employment non-competition agreements.  After considering this proposal and a compromise that would have limited non-competes to six months and prohibited them for hourly employees, Massachusetts legislators have decided to drop non-compete legislation from the economic development bill.


Many employers view non-competes as a valuable tool for protecting their hard-won confidential information, trade secrets, and goodwill.  In a statement released this week, the Greater Boston Area Chamber of Commerce cheered the legislature's decision to leave the state's non-compete law unchanged:


"We believe the state's current law on non-competes strikes an appropriate balance between protecting employers' interests and allowing employee mobility, and we are pleased with the Legislature's decision to keep this policy in place.  Non-compete policy in Massachusetts is well developed and its usage on a voluntary basis by both employers and employees is well established.  We encourage the Governor to sign this bill, leaving the state's current non-compete policy intact."


Had Governor Patrick's proposed legislation passed, Massachusetts would have joined a handful of states--California being the most notable example--that prohibit or sharply limit post-employment non-competition agreements.  It remains to be seen whether opponents of non-competes will get a bill passed in the future or whether the movement will fizzle.  But at least for now, companies with employees in Massachusetts remain free to use appropriately tailored non-competes to protect their reasonable business interests.